BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:41:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
there is no essential difference between the
hive bees and the flying bees in terms of number of Varroa mites.
Only the water-canying bees were considerably less infested.
But in drones, the situation is different: a considerably greater
number of drones in the hive were found to be infested (41.9%) as
compared to the flying drones (5.2%) Of the drones caught at the drone
congregation area (6.1%) And consequently, the average amount of
infested drones (18.2%) is much greater than that of worker bees (3.6%)

SPREAD OF VARROA JACOBSON! FROM ONE COLONY TO ANOTHER. Apiacta 2, 1981


> The remarkable rate at which varroa has spread throughout most of the world is due both to the particular biology of the mite and to the nature of modern beekeeping. In eastern Europe and West Germany the rate of natural movement of the mites has been estimated at about 3 km per year. 

MITE PESTS OF HONEY BEES. Ann. Rev. EntomoL 1982. 27:229-52

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2