BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
bob darrell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Oct 2005 22:12:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Oct 5, 2005, at 11:34 AM, Chuck Norton wrote:

>  Because it is unlikely that any one company or person will
> undergo the gauntlet and expense for FDA approval of oxalic acid
> applications that have gained approval in Europe and Canada are either
> delayed gaining FDA acceptance or are never filed with the FDA
> because of
> the lengthy and costly process. The FDA trusts no one except
> itself, not
> even its Canadian or European counterparts, and the beekeepers in this
> country unfortunately carry on their shoulders, their hives and in
> their
> pocket books this same burden of trust.

The Canadian Honey Council(Canadian national beekeepers association)
presented the Canadian equivalent of the FDA, the PMRA, with the
documentation required to get approval. This work by the CHC was
funded, in part, by beekeeper donations. Are there no American
equivalents to the CHC?

Bob Darrell
Caledon Ontario
Canada
44N80W

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2