BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:40:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>My conclusion is that MAQS has worked well in the colonies with
"reasonable" mite loads.  In the ones with "whopping" (for lack of a better
scientific term) the treatment was not enough and a 2nd one I thought was
advised.

Karla, this is exactly the sort of decisions that we make.  If mite loads
somehow get high, then it is much more difficult to bring them down to an
acceptable level, since you need a much higher rate of efficacy of kill.  I
have only used formic for a few years, and find it handy to use when there
is honey on the hives still to be extracted.   If not, we are experimenting
between thymol and formic.  And of course an oxalic dribble clean up in
late fall.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2