BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 22:28:40 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Computer Software
Solutions Ltd <[log in to unmask]> writes
>Does anybody know of any mathematical relationship between the number of
>mites which will fall as the result of the insertion for diagnosis of
>Apistan/Bayvarol strips, and the total number of mites in the hive?
Norman has answered this so here is a small addition. I suggest you use
the OMF under all colonies and put a tray under each for a day or two in
May and see what you get. Use the multiplier and take it from there. Use
any integrated method you wish and monitor again, say, a month later.
Adjust the potency of your method(s) to suit the level found. You can
monitor the mites for damage and consider breeding from those colonies
doing most damage.

What do people say about this approach? I haven't tried it yet as I have
chickened out and have only used an annual application as one of the
herd but it is the logical conclusion to integration, which would have
to be on an individualised basis. The critical time would be late in the
year when overwhelmed colonies disperse.
--
James Kilty

ATOM RSS1 RSS2