BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir Ptacek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 1996 08:39:31 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
On Sun, 28 Jan 1996 03:57:36 -0800, John Caldeira wrote:
 
>Are Mavrik, Spur and other forms of fluvalinate, or formic acid, commonly
>used to treat varroa-infested hives in the U.S.?  I realize these treatments
>are not currently approved for use with bees in the U.S., but does the cost
>difference between Apistan and these unapproved treatments provide a strong
>temptation for commercial beekeepers?
>
>How widespread is the use of unapproved treatments?  Would appreciate
>learning from any speculation and/or knowledge on this.
>
>Public or private E-mail.
>
>Thanks,
>
>John Caldeira
>[log in to unmask]
>
>John Caldeira
>Dallas, Texas
 
Here, in the Czech Republic we never used Apistan to control Varroas, and
after more than 10 years of their presence in the coutry we still have
nearly the same level of colony numbers. An effective complex of different
methods has been applied with the aim to use as little chemicals
as possible.
Those of you interested in details write dirrectly to the
Institute for Beekeeping at Dol,
252 66 Libcice n. Vlt.,
       Czech Republic
 
Best regards,
Vladimir Ptacek
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fac. Sci., Dpt. Anim. Physiol.        E.mail: [log in to unmask]
Masaryk University                    phone:  .42/5/41129 562
611 37 Brno, Czech Republic           fax:    .42/5/41211 214

ATOM RSS1 RSS2