In jurisdictions where rules are clear about adulteration, then a case
could be made that Dhampur is conspiring with its customers to break the
law. In that event, Dhampur could be charged with conspiracy.  A "sting"
would be easy to set up.  If Andy (or anyone else) gets his sample
together with literature which suggests mixing it with honey, a trip to
the AG might be in order.
 
(No claim to legal expertise intended.)
 
 
 
Andy wrote in response to amschelp:
 
>*FYI* ripped off the sci.arg.beekeeping news group
 
>>California already has laws against such adulteration.
 
>One thing for sure the Dhampur cane sugar company does make a product
>of invert sugar they call a honey-analog or H-ana and their promotion
>would lead most reasonable people to believe they are selling it to
>beekeepers and honey packers all over the world to blend with honey
>50/50 or 1 to 1 to sell the resulting sugar product as honey....
 
>You can find web connections to Dhampur and other information on
>Honey-analog or H-ana at: http://beenet.com/bnews.htm
 
--