BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 06:55:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Peter Edwards wrote:

> There is a difference between 'kill' and attempt total annihilation.  We
> know that if there is no virus present then colonies can live with very
> large numbers of varroa  - I have seen reports of up to 12,500.  Perhaps if
> we had bees that were not susceptible to the viruses then they would be able
> to tolerate much greater loads naturally.

When you look at the size of the Varroa mite compared to the size of the
host, I question the ability of a colony to sustain high mite loads. In
comparison, it would be like carrying a tick the size of a volleyball on
our back. Not sure I could tolerate that. I doubt my bees would last the
winter here in Maine with high mite loads.

Usually bees that live with the mites have low colony mite loads which
means few bees are affected.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2