BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:33:18 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Mark Dettori
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>The other method I have heard of, the Snelgrove method,
>isolates the pheromones of one queen from the other, save for maybe a 24
>hour declining period during a transfer of field bees from one box to
>the other.  This, from my uneducated perspective, seems to be by purpose
>and makes the Snelgrove more complicated and time consuming.
The Snelgrove board was designed to separate an artificial swarm (lower
box) from the brood and queen cells (upper box). The opening and closing
of the various entrances are designed to remove flying bees from the
queen cells, help the lower colony and stop swarming from the upper box
(it can happen). It is not designed as a 2-queen system, but keeps the
pheromones mingling if you want to unite them as a 2-queen system once
you have the mated queen upstairs. If the timing of the split fits the
seasons well, the 2-queens have ample time to build a larger crop,
though most people (AFAIK) would give the whole of the colony over to
the young queen, releasing more flying bees to forage.
--
James Kilty

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2