BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Baker's Bees <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:24:15 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Reading the latest post on Bee Culture Magazine I ran into the following troubling thought:

"Canadian beekeepers are currently concerned about mites developing resistance to amitraz and thymol and exhibited efficacy rate below 30% when used under fall conditions1.”

http://www.beeculture.com/catch-buzz-bayvarol-gets-nod-canada/

Reading the study it appears that Thymovar, a strip based thymol product was used, and that the efficacy was poor. Is this a because of thymol resistance, or a poorly designed product?

I’ve seen high efficacy when using thymol, specifically Apiguard in late August in Denver, Colorado. Is anybody seeing thymol resistance  or low efficacy when using a product like Apiguard?

David Baker
             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2