From: Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

>This is what Ellis, Hayes, and Ellis had to say:

Hi Peter,

There are a number of studies on small cell, and I think we should discuss them all.

However, you have been touting the most recent of the studies as recently as Saturday...and you have been doing so for over a year.  I've only recently been able to actually read the study, so there was little to discuss.

I posted here a thoughtful critique of the study.  Before I do the work to go through the Ellis/Hayes/Ellis study, I'd appreciate some substantive comment on the Seeley study.  I posted a link to it, so you've certainly had the opportunity to review it in light of my critique.  "the earth is round" hardly qualifies.

The silence is deafening, and I can't really see the point of citing studies and/or critiquing them if we can't actually discuss them as well.

deknow

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm