BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Doug Yanega <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Jun 1995 13:09:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>   Spencer said Limric's hair gel seemed the only logical catalyst for the
>attack, since the stings were mostly on his scalp. Vu and Pfeiffer, who weren't
>wearing any gel, were standing next to Limric but were not attacked. Spencer
>wasn't able to say exactly what was in the gel.
 
It sounds like maybe one of the chemicals used to give it a scent was an
analog of the Apis attack pheromone (which I distinctly recall - having
been stung in the nose by African bees - as having a rather fruity smell).
Ever since I was attacked, I've avoided floral or fruit scented shampoos as
a precautionary measure. Now I'll know not to start using hair gel. ;-)
 
Doug Yanega      Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 E. Peabody Dr.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA     phone (217) 244-6817, fax (217) 333-4949
  "There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
        is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82

ATOM RSS1 RSS2