BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kerry Clark of AGF 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:37:05 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (58 lines)
Date:          Tue, 28 Jan 1997 08:29:02 -0800 (PST)
From:          "Kerry Clark of AGF 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299"
 <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:       Re: Surviving Varroa
   Survival with varroa and without treatment is not necessarily an
   indication of resistant bees. In some situations, survival of a
   colony can result from the type of varroa, rather than some
   characteristic of the bees.
 
   Buchler 1994, in Bee World 75 (2): 54 - 70 (this good review of
   varroa tolerance is available  at the IBRA website) mentions an
   isolated apiary in Austria where colonies have been maintained with
   varroa and without treatment for 8 years. One explanation might be
   that resistance or tolerance has been selected in the bees.
   However, when unselected bee stock is brought (without varroa) into
   the area, it too becomes only moderately infested and does not
   require treatment. The key difference seems to be that 50 to 60 %
   of these varroa in worker brood are infertile.
 
   de Guzman's work in detecting 2 different types of varroa in North
   America might be a step along the way toward benefiting from this
   type of observation. I think this was reported at ABRC, but I
   wasn't there. Can anyone who attended, add a comment?
 
 
   Selection of "less pathogenic" tracheal mites might also be
   happening throughout North America, at the same time as
   "resistance" may be building in bee stock.
 
   By the way, although many of these discussions use "tolerance" and
   "resistance" (to varroa) interchangeabley, it seems to me that
   tolerance implies no effect on the (former) harmful agent, while
   resistance would include (but maybe not be limited to) mechanisms
   that inhibit the source of the harm. eg. a bee stock that is
   tolerant of tracheal mites, might show no lower infestation than
   other stocks, but would do better in spite of it. A bee stock that
   is resistant to tracheal mites would show consistently lower
   infestations (with the same tracheal mite population).
 
   Is this distinction consistent with usage of these terms in
   parasitology?
 
   If so, it seems to me we should be referring to varroa being
   selected showing "tolerance" to fluvalinate, rather than
   "resistance": Where varroa have been selected and are no longer
   controlled by fluvalinate, I don't imagine that there is any less
   fluvalinate in the hive environment, the mites are just tolerating
   it more.
 
   Regards
 
   Kerry Clark, Apiculture Specialist
   B.C. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
   1201 103 Ave
   Dawson Creek B.C.
    V1G 4J2  CANADA              Tel (250) 784-2231     fax (250) 784-2299
   INTERNET [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2