BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Allen Dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:52:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>I philosophically object to suffocating bees. It is a horrible way to die. ... however. A safer, if more cumbersome approach would be to use CO2. 

How does that differ from suffocation?  My understanding is that the action of soffocation is the virtually the same as CO2, since the bees activity generates CO2 which knocks them out and kills them.

I suspect that suffocation is quicker and less traumatic than your other suggestions, and it is 'natural'.  

Have you ever watched bees in alcohol?  That is the only part of my sampling job that I hate.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2