BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:09:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>
>    Note that the current practice of seed treatment is the opposite: it
> applies chemicals as the first applied option instead of the last resort.
>

In essence, do not treat seed but, when the problems are identified by IPM,
it is too late. Then you are into spray, dust and other more dangerous to
bees types of applications.

If we applied IPM to ourselves, we would stop vaccinations and wait for the
diseases to develop.

So far, in Maine, we have had about four bee pesticide kills and all were
from spray and none from the neonics.

BTW. If you recall, fipronil is a major bee killer and, when soil injected,
will affect bees dramatically. It is a bad actor.Interesting they coupled
it with imid and its cousins.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2