>> How about more recent anecdotes than 100 year-old ones?

> I suggest having a good look at Pellett's book before dismissing his
observations.

Age, while certainly improving wine, does not transform anecdotes into data.

Given the choice between recent observations of measureable metrics, and
older commentary mentioning only qualitative, (not quantitative) factors, is
there any question as to which is more useful?   

 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html