BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Claude Hachey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:09:30 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
"I looked for at least two hours to find a good explanation for this. I know 
that inbreeding
leads to low brood viability but I have never heard of 100% inviable eggs."



Thanks for the search Peter...I could not find much information on my google 
searches either and at this point, any explanation to this puzzle is a good 
explanation.  First time in 25 years I have seen anything like it and I hope 
to not see it again.  I was at another two yards yesterday and found 5 more 
colonies with the same problem.  I just spoke with a fellow beekeeper in my 
province and he seems to think that it is chemical related.  I am hesitant 
to jump on the chemical bandwagon.  I understand the concept of brood 
viability but these colonies were doing fine with brood rearing and managed 
to build up and bring in a honey crop.  It is as though an egg viability 
switch was turned off and the colonies petered (no pun intended) out.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2