BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:40:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
> >Do you recall what the % phoretic count was for the nuc with mites in
> almost every cell?
>
That was the last one that we checked (after we had put away the alcohol
wash materials), and didn't do an alcohol wash on it.  But mite levels were
pretty consistent in the 1-4% range.

>
>  Most had very few mites in the first cells--maybe one out of 10 or more
>>> cells.
>>>
>>
> >This still sounds like a high infestation to me, or is a 10% brood
> infestation common?


In this case, we are not talking about "common,"  this number was for the
first few cells capped once a new queen began laying after a 10-12 day
hiatus.



>   >This probably means that most of the brood that was capped later has
> lower infestation than the frame you checked?
>

That would be my guess, but I have no data to support.

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2