BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Walton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Sep 1998 18:10:18 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
In article <[log in to unmask]>, Tony Dixon
<[log in to unmask]> writes
 
<snip>
> Vancouver Island was embargoed for honey bees
>because the Island was mite free and it was believed that by stopping the
>movement of bees and bee equipment onto the Island it could stay that way.
>This last year Varroa has made it here, probably on a vehicle or in freight.
>I hope not because of a thoughtless beekeeper.
<snip>
>Despite all counter measures our Governments can devise, and in this case a
>20 mile water barrier, mites still spread.
 
This sounds very much like the attempts at keeping varroa out of the UK.
The last I heard, it had spread all the way up to Scotland. When will
governments learn that such schemes can only be relied upon as a
delaying mechanism at best?
--
Paul Walton
Bedfordshire, England
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2