BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Randy Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:00:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I'd like to get this straight.  Do you mean laying workers or drone-laying
queens?  I had a late season virgin last year that failed to mate and became
a drone-layer in February.

It was a mess, and difficult to determine each case.   Most colonies clearly
had laying workers, judging by the piled up eggs in cells, but many also had
patterns that looked like they were layed by a queen, but developed into
drones--so I'd assume drone layer queens. A very few queens managed to mate,
but many later failed. We saw the full spectrum, and it took us months to
get everything straightened out!

An observation I've made again and again over the years is that laying
worker brood is extremely susceptible to chalkbrood infection.  Anyone else
notice this?

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2