BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 08:30:47 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
>
> >The problem is, we don't have any proof that supersedure is "caused" by
> this. You would think that the colony would supersede under these
> circumstances
>

You're absolutely right Pete.  QMP is generally a "true" signal of ovarian
status; one would reasonably expect queens that can't attract a retinue to
be superseded.  However, QMP may not reflect sperm viability.

>
> >Nobody knows how supersedure is initiated. Some colonies supersede
> apparently "good" queens, whereas others fail to supersede even after the
> queen becomes a drone layer and is completely shot.
>

We have all noticed that honey bees delight in making exceptions to the
"rules."

>
> > I think that swarming is also based upon her reproductive state. Again,
> no proof.


I suspect more due to the state of the colony than of the queen.


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2