BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
George Styer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 31 Jan 1999 17:34:42 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Stefan Stangaciu wrote:
 
>     The big ADVANTAGE of the alternative methods is that you
> can use them AS OFTEN AS IT'S NECESSARY without affecting
> the products quality, of course if you will use the proper
> methods and at proper times!!!
>
 
Take a look at the Swiss study chronicled in the Jan 99 issue of ABJ.
Trained and untrained testers were used to test the taste threshold (the
point at which the substance can be tasted) of different alternative
treatment methods. The threshold for the essential oils tested was very
low. So while you may be able to use them "AS OFTEN AS IT'S NECESSARY", you
can't use them just any time you please without affecting the quality of
honey. I don't think there are many commercial beekeepers out there that
are willing to remove thousands of supers, treat with oils and then put the
supers back on.
 
Whatever treatment we speak of, all must be used with, as you say, "the
proper
methods and at proper times".
 
BTW, I have thouroghly enjoyed this thread.
 
----------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2