BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Elliott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Oct 2001 18:43:13 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>  I recall reading somewhere along the line that it takes some 12 pounds of
> honey to produce 1
> pound of wax.  Since a big chunk of the honey goes to comb production, there
> is obviously less left in the cells.

Assuming this figure to be accurate, how much does a super of empty natural comb
(that is without foundation) weigh?  That is how much wax is actually needed?  I
would guess (purely gut reaction) that labor would be more costly than honey.

Tom
--
"Test everything.  Hold on to the good."  (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

Tom Elliott
Chugiak,  Alaska
U.S.A.
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2