Perhaps the "Precautionary Principle" applies here.
http://www.gdrc.org/u-gov/precaution-3.html
This statement was drafted and finalized at a conference at the Wingspread Conference Center,
Racine, Wisconsin, which took place 23-25 January 1998. The 32 authors of the statement are
listed beneath the statement.
The release and use of toxic substances, resource exploitation, and physical alterations of the
environment have had substantial unintended consequences on human health and the
environment. Some of these concerns are high rates of learning deficiencies, asthma, cancer, birth
defects and species extinctions; along with global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion;
and worldwide contamination with toxic substances and nuclear materials.
We believe existing environmental regulations and other decisions, particularly those based on
risk assessment, have failed to adequately protect human health and the environment, as well as
the larger system of which humans are but a part.
We believe there is compelling evidence that damage to humans and the worldwide environment,
is of such magnitude and seriousness that new principles for conducting human activities are
necessary.
While we realize that human activities may involve hazards, people must proceed more carefully
than has been the case in recent history. Corporations, government entities, organizations,
communities, scientists and other individuals must adopt a precautionary approach to all human
endeavors.
Therefore it is necessary to implement the Precautionary Principle: Where an activity raises threats
of harm to the environment or human health, precautionary measures should be taken even if
some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.
In this context the proponent of an activity, rather than the public bears the burden of proof.
The process of applying the Precautionary Principle must be open, informed and democratic, and
must include potentially affected parties. It must also involve an examination of the full range of
alternatives, including no action.
Wingspread conference participants:
(Affiliations noted for identification purposes only.)
Dr. Nicholas Ashford, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Katherine Barrett, Univ. of British Columbia
Anita Bernstein, Chicago-Kent College of Law
Dr. Robert Costanza, University of Maryland
Pat Costner, Greenpeace
Dr. Carl Cranor, Univ. of California, Riverside
Dr. Peter deFur, Virginia Commonwealth Univ. Gordon Durnil, attorney
Dr. Kenneth Geiser, Toxics Use Reduction Institute, Univ. of Mass., Lowell
Dr. Andrew Jordan, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, Univ. Of
East Anglia, United Kingdom
Andrew King, United Steelworkers of America, Canadian Office, Toronto, Canada
Dr. Frederick Kirschenmann, farmer
Stephen Lester, Center for Health, Environment and Justice
Sue Maret, Union Institute
Dr. Michael M'Gonigle, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Dr. Peter Montague, Environmental Research Foundation
Dr. John Peterson Myers, W. Alton Jones Foundation
Dr. Mary O'Brien, environmental consultant
Dr. David Ozonoff, Boston University
Carolyn Raffensperger, Science and Environmental Health Network
Dr. Philip Regal, University of Minnesota
Hon. Pamela Resor, Massachusetts House of Representatives
Florence Robinson, Louisiana Environmental Network
Dr. Ted Schettler, Physicians for Social Responsibility
Ted Smith, Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition
Dr. Klaus-Richard Sperling, Alfred-Wegener- Institut, Hamburg, Germany
Dr. Sandra Steingraber, author
Diane Takvorian, Environmental Health Coalition
Joel Tickner,University of Mass., Lowell
Dr. Konrad von Moltke, Dartmouth College
Dr. Bo Wahlstrom, KEMI (National Chemical Inspectorate), Sweden
Jackie Warledo, Indigenous Environmental Network
****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm *
****************************************************
|
