BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Fredericksen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 May 2007 15:33:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
There's a difference between a reporter misquoting someone and being lazy and using other news 
articles as sources. 

How many times has the cell phone, Einstein, and EU,Canada, Brazil remarks been recycled? There is 
no proof for any of these in fact if a reporter or john Q public does just a few minutes of searching 
online one would quickly see that there are numerous other reports debunking these so called facts. 
In fact weeks later these same myths are being recirculated in articles almost every day

I had a reporter call here a couple of weeks ago and left a message. I called back 15 minutes later. 
Too late big hurry, never heard from him agian. The resulting article said something to the effect, Mn 
honeybees are still hibernating so beekeepers are not sure what they will find when they open hives. 
This was late April . 

Not a single beekeeper was interviewed. A bunch of the familiar recycled junk from the internet was 
cited as news. This is not unique to the bee story and a big reason why Web 2.0 is taking off as 
people are fed up with junk news. 

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2