BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Peter L. Borst" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:18:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
G H Cale's ideas are outlined clearly in the Hive and the Honeybee
(1975 edition):

> The final evaluation of any inbred line must rest upon its performance in cross or hybrid combinations. Only a few lines out of many tested are retained because only a *few* show superior performance as hybrids.

> When ordinary inbred lines are crossed, the progeny in some cases fail to show heterosis (hybrid vigor). More than that, with ordinary inbred lines there is no clear-cut way to achieve highly desirable lines that are compatible with each other during the inbreeding process.

> The value of heterotic effects in a bee-breeding program depends upon the demonstration that hybrids may be formed having a greater productivity than the normally available honey bees. The average honey yields of the hybrids was 106 %.

He goes on to state:

> one must conclude that enormous opportunities in bee breeding are at hand.

-- 
Peter L. Borst

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2