BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:37:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Reply:
>Seeing how this was done back in '92,,,

Hi Dee,

I don’t understand why PB upholds the study as not supportive of small 
cell, for the information actually supports small cell.  If you look at 
info from the study on the link below, it clearly shows less reproducing 
mites in smaller sized cells along with more non reproducing mites in 
small cells when compared to the larger sizes.  This would over time have 
a significant impact on the mite population 

http://www.algonet.se/~beeman/research/cell.htm

Joe Waggle 
Ecologicalbeekeeping.com 
‘Bees Gone Wild Apiaries' 
Feral Bee Project:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FeralBeeProject/

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2