BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Nov 2005 07:58:08 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
--- "D. Murrell" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
...How could natural equilibrium be pushed so far
> out of bounds that it
> requires a beekeepers intervention with regression
> to re-establish it?


A very good question!
IMHO, there are other things that had an equally
severe impact on the equilibrium.  For instance, the
practice of shipping bees into vastly different
climatic areas that the genetics are not acclimatized
to will also severely impact the equilibrium of the
already established local population thru breeding,
making the local adapted genetics 'less fit' for their
own climate.  And then there's artificially propping
up of poor genetics thru artificial stimulants and
chemicals keeps these genes in the breeding pool that
would otherwise not deserve it.  Then there's grafting
which 'if not done properly', takes out the "survival
of the fittest" and genetic variation equation.  Also
drone colonies, unnaturally flood the area with huge
numbers of drones from genetics which might otherwise
not have earned this unfair advantage thru natural
process.

Please note that I did not mention size cell anywhere
in my post. ;>)



__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2