BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kerry Clark 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Oct 1995 09:42:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
   Gerard Worrell kindly forwarded the note about bees being used to
   disperse nuclear polyhedrosis virus of corn earworm, but was concerned
   about the public relations problem of honey from such "pesticide
   contaminated" bees and hives.
 
   I'd consider wisely-aimed insect viruses as a pest management tool that
   could reduce "traditional" pesticide use, and the bee kill and other
   problems they may cause. I don't know if any of the virus (or talc
   carrier) ends up in honey.. I'd guess extremely little or none, but even
   if it were detectable, I think exposure through such honey to these
   viruses would have no significance to non-insects.
   The bees are obviously closer to any potential problem (the product
   mixing with pollen, etc). I would expect that (and other non-target
   exposure) would have to be well addressed, but again, the virus used is
   probably of no significance to bees. That's what the assessment prior to
   pesticide registration addresses.
 
   It might require some public education effort.
 
 
   Kerry Clark, Apiculture Specialist
   B.C. Ministry of Agriculture
   1201 103 Ave
   Dawson Creek B.C.
        V1G 4J2  CANADA          Tel (604) 784-2225     fax (604) 784-2299
   INTERNET [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2