BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eugene Makovec <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:06:34 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
>Why were the results different?  How was the design of the study changed?

In the original "research", monarch caterpillars were fed a steady diet of
the Bt pollen. But in the real world, not only does the corn not produce
pollen at the same time the caterpillars are feeding on adjacent milkweed,
but even if it did they would not be consuming anywhere near the levels the
lab subjects were fed.

Unfortunately, our media thrive on doom and gloom, so while the initial
"sky-is-falling" reports were broadcast far and wide, the subsequent
refutation was largely ignored.

Eugene Makovec
Kirkwood, MO USA

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2