BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:24:01 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
> If the foragers do make the decisions about what pollen to collect -- and
> we know they don't always make wise choices -- could chemicals associated
> with the pollen not influence that decision, even if they do not consume it?

Certainly could, but only if the chemical were detectable by the bee
in some way, such as by smell, taste, or effect (such as stimulation).
 The research that I cited indicated that bees detected nicotine in
nectar by its effect, and would self regulate the dose (contrary to
the instance in Croatia described by Dr. Carson).

But since it is unlikely that pollen foragers eat much pollen, then in
that case they would need to absorb the chemical cutaneously in order
to detect it.  Could happen, but at the low concentrations in pollen,
and the relatively low actual contact to body surfaces, may be a
stretch to think that they are feeling an effect.  But possible, yes.

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2