BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Dec 2006 06:42:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>   There are several options I am considering to initiate the development 
> of the queen cells, none of which involve grafting (at this time).


I really don't understand why beekeepers want to raise queen cells with a 
non-grafting method. All the cell building set-up work is basically the 
same. Some sort of queenless starter, followed by a queenright finisher. 
All the mating nuc set-up is the same, or the re-queening work is the same. 
The only difference is in the grafting. And, in my opinion, grafting is the 
easy part.

And you get all your set-up work done, and your "all-you-gotta-do" method 
fails, and then where are you?
Mike


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/581 - Release Date: 12/9/2006

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2