BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 5.2 performance (was cell size in 1940's)
From:
phil MOORE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 22:15:17 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
.  We found 5.25 noticably
> outperformed even 5.3 in a controlled, but unpublished experiment.
>


In what way do they perform better? I have started using Pierco frames for
the past year in the UK and am wondering what your experiences were.
Regards Phil Moore

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2