BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:46:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
To me 300# is below average. The longer one successfully
keeps bees in a area the more prolific the area becomes.

???

Are you suggesting keeping bees raises the productivity of a region?That's a new one on me.  And where do you get that number _as an average_? I would have to see some proof. The average for most US states is far below that. I have kept bees for forty years, in various places, and to me the suggestion that hives should average 300# in any but the very best locations is unsupportable by the evidence. 

http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Todays_Reports/reports/hony0314.pdf

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2