BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:04:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
> If sugar water
> were being moved 8" from the feeder to a cell that's a lot less energy
> required than to move nectar from the field.  Ergo: Foragers from the field
> will get more poison into them as they need to "digest" much more for
> energy. I don't think the walls of the honey stomach are porous.
>

The bee will still release the 400 ppb syrup to the  proventriculus
regardless of what she is doing. It is all a matter of time. And the 400
ppb, or any other abnormally high concentration, is the issue. The
researcher asks us to accept the rationale of using such high
concentrations because of distribution, which seems to be assumed as even.

I know of no way to insure a reduced dose based on the number of bees as
the feeders will take on the full 400 ppb. For the Harvard study to have
any validity, it has to show what the actual dose is for an individual bee,
as was done in the RFID studies.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2