BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Vladimir V. Obolonkin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Apr 1998 13:20:24 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>>>
Eunice Wonnacott <[log in to unmask]> wrote
 
 
A year or more ago, I saw a report (not on line, as I remember) which
was an English translation of a Russian study   on nectar producing
plants.  They referred to several varieties of buckwheat by name, and
reported on their study as to nectar and pollen supplies.  There was a
vast difference in them.  I wonder if there is any way of accessing this
Russian study?  As I remember, there were several European countries
also included in the study.>>>>
 
Nectar production of Buckwheat (B.) are known here (Russia and post-Soviet
countryes) from ancient times as Buckwheat and B-honey are (and were) very
respectable here.
 
Figures of different B. sorts' nectar prodactivity present in all bee-textbooks.
I remember that the prodactivity can vary from 50 to 190 kilo of honey from
hectar depending of sort.
 
Both mentined textbooks and old beekeepers say that to get B.honey often is
a lack. Becous B. gives nectar in warm (not hot!), wet (not rainly!)
weather. B. NEVER give (they say) nectar crop on freshly manured grounds.
 
Yours
Vladimir O. from Belarus
 
-5 at night, +5-7 at day. Where is the spring going to come?!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2