BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Black <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jan 1997 12:40:25 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Phil Veldhuis
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>If this list is _really_ a discussion of bee biology, then this should
>be respected.  If it is not, then lets clear this matter up, so that
>those people who think they are subscribed to a list dedicated to bee
>biology can unsubscribe and save themselves some time.  I'm OK with a
>beekeepers chat list, but lets not kid ourselves.
 
A newish subscriber myself I must reluctantly ('cos I'm a charitable
sort) echo Phil's comments about a growing trend. I'd naively supposed
that one 'chatted' in <sci.agriculture.beekeeping> and 'discussed' in
BEE-L. Not so it seems, even though many of the participants are the
same and some threads cross posted. Could it not be so ?
--
Dave Black
Blacks Bee Gardens,
Guildford, GU1 4RN.  UK.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2