BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:50:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Brian Ames wrote:
>I am confused by the title of this post. 

Yeah, me too. I read Bayer's report and it came across as a well reasoned and accurate 
reflection of what is known about bee losses.

QUOTED MATERIAL:
Recent reports of the French Food Safety
Agency (AFFSA) have concluded that Gaucho® played little if any
role in the massive bee colony losses that occurred in France during
the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. These reports conclude that the
main factors causing these losses were varroa mites, pathogens
(including viruses and Nosema ceranae), nutritional deficiencies,
and beekeeper use of unapproved miticides. Bee health monitoring
studies in Germany and Canada have also indicated biological
factors, rather than pesticides, are the main factors causing colony
losses.

Bayer's "Response to National Honey Bee Advisory Board Letter on Imidacloprid
Registration Review"

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2