BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim Vaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:49:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>
>So in a typical queenright colony at this time of year there may be as many
>as half a dozen laying workers.  I think it was Aebi who wrote (although I
>don't know his source) that maybe 1% of laying workers can lay female eggs.
>So maybe something in the region of one colony in 20 will have a laying
>worker producing female eggs.
>
>That is one of several (more likely) explanations for something I found
this
>year: a sealed queen cell several inches above a good queen excluder with
no
>other brood above the QE.  The queen was in full lay below the QE.
>
>Chris


Yes, and I'm glad for that explaination too. When I saw something similar
in one of my scut hives I wondered if all those old tales were true of a
hive stealing an egg from another hive in the area. The whole concept of
thelytoky seems much more reasonable :-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2