BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:32:14 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
> Early studies were meant to determine if neonics were safe to use in the
> field. Later "studies" attempted to prove that neonics are highly toxic to
> bees, an entirely different goal.

I thought it was widely accepted that the neonics were highly toxic to bees?
Says so right on the labels I have looked at.

I can't see what purpose proving the neonics are highly toxic to bees would
serve?

I can almost see those poor lab bees writhing in pain.  Maybe we should use
flies instead for neonic studies? What purpose is there for flies?

Flies will certainly ruin a picnic. I think we should use flies instead of 
bees.

bob

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2