I believe the treatment-free folks claims, and I am not saying anyone is a liar, but for their success to be scientifically relevant, it must be replicated by other researchers. Repeatedly. Replication is crucial.

Proper measurements, well-documented procedures, clearly defined terms and goals are all valuable for other people trying to replicate the experiment. And when/if a result is surprising, that careful documentation can offer clues as to why someone got the unexpected results.

So while I am happy for those who succeed without treatment, (and wish that I had that success) it isn’t useful to others without clear documentation of what was done to achieve those results.

Sent from my iPhone
             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html