BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Eyre <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:04:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
On 16 Jul 99, at 17:25, Joe Hemmens wrote:

> Mean characteristics of honey bee queens produced by transferring
> eggs or larvae from worker cells to queen cells at various stages.
>
> Stage    Weight mg  No. Ovarioles  Spm Dia mm  Spm Vol mm3
>
> Egg       209            317                1.31               1.18
>
> 1 Day    189            308                1.28               1.09
>
> 2 Days  172            292                1.21               0.94
>
> 3 Days  147            272                1.16               0.82
>
> 4 Days  119            224                1.03               0.59

I think this illustrates the point I've been trying to make for some
time. Taking larvae too old will mean a loss of size (weaker) a loss
of Ovarioles (less eggs) and a general reduction in queen
performance, apart from regressive behaviour.
        It matters not if you've got 3, 300, 3000 hives poor performance
should not be tolerated. Only a poor business man will allow second
best stock to persist, especially if he knows there is an
alternative.



*****************************************
The Bee Works, 9 Progress Drive, Unit 2,
Orillia, Ontario, Canada.L3V 6H1.
Phone (705)326 7171 Fax (705)325 3461
David Eyre, Owner
e-mail<[log in to unmask]>
http://www.beeworks.com
This months special:-Headset magnifiers
****************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2