I agree completely. With my focus on public archaeology, I probably have
more contact with latent archaeological tendencies than I do with real
professionals. However as several people have pointed out, we do need to
maintain our professionalism and lots of patients. It is a real delicate
matter dealing with folks who are obviously not going to respect your
assessment. I try not to relegate their interpretations as untrue, but try
to open their eyes to alternative perspectives that are at least equally
valid. I try to understand as much about their perspective as possible and
consider it a possibility and then put forth my interpretation. Such is the
case with a recent encounter with a dowser. I had a dowser who was
convinced that he had discovered historic graves at development site, when I
examined the area there was no evidence of graves. It really helped that we
recently had a discussion about dowsing on this listserv. I was able to
discuss dowsing with him and explain my methodology. While I did not
convince him of my perspective, he seemed to have some respect for me and it
was a rather cordial agreement to disagree.
Jay Stottman
Kentucky Archaelogical Survey
----- Original Message -----
From: Henderson, Mark <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: Purveyor of an Alternate Reality - Fictional History
> Jay and others- Everytime we do self diagnosis we are substituting our
> lay-person's understanding for a trained physician's expertise. I feel
> quite successful in pointing this out when speaking with individuals and
> groups about archeology and archeological conservation ethics. I allege
> that everyone is an archeologist, like everyone is doctor. I think it is
> human nature to be interested in our individual and collective past, and
> more certainly it is human nature to be concerned about our personal
> physical well-being. As a former union representative, I would
> sometimes have to remind my union brothers and sisters of the old addage
> that ' a person who represents himself has a fool for a client.' As an
> archeologist and as a union representative it is not unusual to have
> people ignore my opinions and advice in areas where I have expertise.
> Who among us has not chosen to ignore "doctor's orders" because we "know
> better." The physicians I respect the most are the ones that don't feel
> threatened by their patient's self diagnosis, but use what I think is
> this natural human desire for expert knowledge, insight and explanation.
> What is troubling are the times, as an archeologist where my
> "expertise" has been flawed, after gaining a layperson's confidence in
> that expertise. More troubling still are the cases where as a Union Rep
> my diagnosis or remedies failed. I think I know why I wouldn't want to
> be a physician. What I think about when people are not convinced that
> my archeological expertise is not what they want to hear (which I think
> arguably is more frequently for those of us in applied contexts than in
> academic settings), I think that often I am fortunate. Those folks
> probably will never be allies in conservation of resources anyhow, no
> matter how much I invest in trying to advise them. What is much tougher
> is, as a civil servant, I can not refuse service to any citizen just
> because they "dis" my expertise. Much of my career has been spent in
> generally 'hostile work environments' toward archeology and
> archeologists. That wears many of us down, but really most of our
> shortfalls don't have the direct dire consequences on another
> individual's well being as a physician's shortcomings in expertise. And
> we don't pay the high malpractice insurance premiums to prove it.
> Likewise as a union rep I could not refuse to represent anyone who was
> in my bargaining unit. I think one of the weekly themes on the TV show
> ER is a client who the long-suffering competent physician has to do her
> best to serve, but whose client won't voluntarily seek counsel
> elsewhere. At least Bill White's client went away. So it isn't that
> people are initially anymore dismissive of archeological expertise than
> medical expertise, it is just that they are a lot less forgiving when a
> physician makes an error; and maybe that is as it should be? -Mark
>
> Jay and Beth Stottman wrote:
>
> > People believe what they want to believe. In my dealings with similar
> > people (which around KY it was the myth of Welsh Prince Madoc), they
> > don't look to us for real help or expertise. They just want someone
> > with credentials to verify their interpretations, when we don't, they
> > consider us part of a conspiracy. I will have people argue with me that
> > plain old rocks are artifacts, even when they asked me what they were to
> > begin with. I usually ask them if they would question their physician
> > on their expertise. But, for some reason our expertise of cultural
> > materials is just not valid unless we agree with them. I guess we just
> > have one of those jobs that anyone could do and you really don't need
> > any education for.
> >
> >
> >
> > M. Jay Stottman
> >
> > Kentucky Archaeological Survey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > From: William White <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 11:07 AM
> >
> > Subject: Purveyor of an Alternate Reality - Fictional History
> >
> >
> > List Members:
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is something I would like to share with the list that might
> > spark discussion of similar encounters. Enjoy....
> >
> >
> >
> > Being employed with a research/museum institution under university
> > affiliation, I am occasionally asked meet with general members of
> > the public seeking assistance or advise. One visitor had some
> > artifacts to show me yesterday that would "rewrite" the history of
> > the American Revolution. He informed me that he was the CEO of a
> > consulting firm for the location of heavy metal resources,
> > particularly abandoned treasures. He further stated that he had
> > recently filed a claim of abandoned property in the Las Vegas
> > Valley, Nevada, where he had found evidence of a bivouac area and
> > underground storage bunkers associated with the Continental Army of
> > George Washington. He told me that the English Army had plans to
> > invade the western half of America (then belonging to Spain) by
> > sailing up the Colorado River and landing troops in the vicinity of
> > Hoover Dam, a chapter that had been "intentionally" left out of the
> > history books.
> >
> >
> >
> > Listening with interest I asked to see his evidence upon which he
> > produced three locally available limestone rocks recovered from the
> > property. The first, he said was a cameo in the likeness of George
> > carved by one of the troops (there was some
> > natural resemblance). The second was a broken fragment of a
> > Greek discus (yes the Greeks also sailed up the Colorado River).
> > The last stone was "compressed opium" and when tilted to a
> > certain angle would reveal a hidden map of the Indus Valley which
> > has similar characteristics to the Las Vegas Valley. Pointing to a
> > hole in the rock, he said that he knew of corresponding cave in the
> > nearby mountains where he was positive that the real Declaration of
> > Independence had been stored by B. Franklin.
> >
> >
> >
> > Neither agreeing or disagreeing with his proposition, I assured him
> > that the artifacts he was showing me were not consistent with
> > Revolution-era material objects but were simply limestone rocks. He
> > questioned my credentials and I had to admit that I did not have
> > experience with such artifacts since they were not found outside of
> > the eastern states. I then asked how I could be of further help? He
> > stated that he needed investors and a
> > university-based archaeological group to take on the excavation of
> > the bunkers. I informed him that we were a contractor, firms
> > hired us to do archaeological work and that we could not be of
> > assistance to him unless he paid us. He then stormed out of the
> > museum yelling that nobody believed him. Ouch, a touch of reality
> > there.........
> >
|