Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 9 Nov 1999 08:53:52 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kevin Sutton wrote:
>let's keep in mind that there are many young aspiring musicians who have
>not heard our warhorses yet for the first time. Let's not deprive them
>of the opportunity we once had to hear great music live!
Let's keep this in perspective. First, I never suggested a "ban"
on anything. It was Karl Miller's nameless teacher, enthusiastically
supported by Julia Werthimer, who raised the idea of a total Beethoven
boycott for an unspecified period. Second, I wrote "So I propose that
anyone who feels tempted to a concert that includes the Sibelius VC (and
has heard it frequently before) should telephone the box office . . ." Note
the "and has heard it frequently before". I don't suppose for a moment
that my plan, even if enthusiastically taken up by all 900-odd of us and
all our friends and relations, would result in *no* performances of the
Sibelius VC being available to newcomers. Third, I was only talking about
one year! I agree absolutely with Kevin's points about continuous exposure
of the "great classic masterpieces" / warhorses, and also that even very
experienced concertgoers may have surprising gaps in their live experience.
I've got plenty of them despite being a very regular attender for over
thirty years. That's part of the reason why I could do with rather fewer
performances of several very over-played pieces. I don't want to hear yet
another SVC when I could be hearing something I've never heard live before.
Further - and this is something that concerns me more now that I have to
pay London prices rather than Scottish ones - I don't want to have to pay
well over the cost of a top-price CD (and often a double one!) to go to a
concert where I've already heard one of the pieces three or four times this
year.
Ian Crisp
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|