Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 10 Feb 2000 01:28:56 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kevin Sutton wrote:
>Sandra Beane wrote:
>
>>In reguards to the bach suites. I feel that Rosterpovich is the best. ...
>
>Sandra is of course entitled to her opinions, but I completely disagree.
>The Rostropovich to my ears is completely unmusical. He hacks and saws
>away at them as if he cello were a tree to be felled, not an instrument to
>be played. ...
Kevin is of course entitled to his opinion but I completely disagree.
Although I wouldn't choose Rostropovich as my favourite recording to call
him *unmusical* and accuse him of *hacking and sawing* disqualifies any
listener IMO. I wonder if anyone else thinks of Rostropovich that way. I
would be shocked. An then Yo-Yo Ma. The new versions are most certainly
no gimmick at all. I've seen the Ma video - which as I understand was
broadcasted on TV - and I think this is a failure. Ma would do himself a
favour to restrict himself to music. But the recordings were made *before*
the video and they are typical Ma recordings - soft spoken, maybe too
gentle, all sorts of criticism are possible - but they have *nothing* to
do with *Bach TV* or *cheap gimmicks*. They just happened to be used in a
film about which one may have his doubts. I would venture to think that
Kevin was prejudiced against these interpretations for that reason. One
other thing: I was very much impressed by the image of Ma in Mali or
Senegal, having explained a local instrument to him (the *ngoni*, if memory
serves). Afterwards Ma played a part of the first movement of the first
Bach suite, his cello firmly planted in the African soil. He stopped and
commented that in this environment Bach sounded so incredibly *young* to
him. It realized that I felt exactly the same way but hadn't been able to
define it like he did. I found this an important and beautiful
observation.
Philip
|
|
|