Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Bach and Attentive Listening
From:
William Hong <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:10:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
John Smyth wrote:

>What I miss in Bach, (and it's not his fault), is orchestral color, and
>changes in meter and dynamics within single movements.  His music, *within
>movements,* is infused with what I would call a sort of "mono-emotionalism".

I suppose one could quibble with your assertion, by using exceptions
that come to mind (the First Brandenburg?) etc.  But I understand the
overall sweep of what you're saying.  To some extent it is a formalism
characteristic of the time, but mono-emotionalism is not confined to the
Baroque era--certainly there is much music (rondos, and some scherzos for
example) in the Classic era that I would put in the same category.

>There is no sense of ambiguity and mystery.  The Baroque is characterized
>by logic, restraint, and understatement; and while one can always find
>exceptions, the era as a whole just doesn't turn me on.

I suppose by this you mean Baroque MUSIC, and mainly the music of the late
Baroque.  The very early, transitional/Mannerist part of this era is quite
different, at least to my ears.  "Hor che'l ciel e la terra" would be one
counterexample I would propose.  Baroque visual arts may be an entirely
different matter too.....

However, if the music doesn't "turn you on," that's a matter of taste, and
I don't wish to argue with that.

>What Bach does within the musical environment of his times is, of course,
>beyond reproach, but I prefer the music of the composers who stood on his
>shoulders--even though their excessive indulgence can sometimes be at the
>expense of musical logic.

There may still be "logic", in the use of sonata form, or some other
constructions in this later music.  But I tend to think that if any
composer transcends time, form, and logic while giving the impression
of showing complete mastery over them, it is Bach.

>Maybe someday this will change.  One of my piano teachers once said that
>no one under fifty has any business performing Bach or Mozart--an absurd
>statement, but haunting.  Could I be missing the emotional depths?

I think the emotional depths are there, but not as obvious as in later
music.  If you are "missing" them, you aren't alone, and I wouldn't worry
about it.  If the time comes for the music to speak to you, you'll know it.
Until then, enjoy what you like.

Bill H.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV