Roger Hecht wrote:

>>Wasn't Beecham supposed to have recorded that Hendl version? Or was it
>>Reiner?

And Philip Peters responded:

>That is news to me. I thought it was Hendl ;)

It was.  But I don't think Hendl was originally supposed to do it.  What I
can't remember is who was supposed to do it? Nor do I remember why whoever
it was didn't.  I'm pretty sure it was supposed to be Beecham, but I just
can't say for certain.

Roger Hecht