Date: |
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 18:50:00 +0100 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Robert Palmer <[log in to unmask]>:
>I wish I could hear the Ancerl version; he was a wonderful conductor.
Yes he was, and I think one of his main positives is; that he had so high
level in most of what he did, in very different kind of music.
Mats Norrman:
>>A propos Gergiev: I think he reminds of Karajan in much what he does.
>>Anyone agree?
James Tobin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I have never been a Karajan basher, but for many here, this would not be a
>recommendation.
I guess you are right here - but it SHOULD be...
>I grab anything I see with Gergiev conducting.
Everything I have heard by him was worth having. Boris Godunov was
carefully made, and the Tjajkovskij 5 very good - just what popped up in
my brittle mind.
(Not really much, so far, I admit.)
But more to come! Then we have something to wait for, and thats nice.
Jim Tobin responds to me:
>>A propos Gergiev: I think he reminds of Karajan in much what he does.
>>Anyone agree?
>
>I have never been a Karajan basher, but for many here, this would not be a
>recommendation.
I guess you are right here - but it SHOULD be...
>I grab anything I see with Gergiev conducting.
Everything I have heard by him was worth having. Boris Godunov was
carefully made, and the Tjajkovskij 5 very good - just what popped up in my
brittle mind.
(Not really much, so far, I admit.)
But more to come! Then we have something to wait for, and thats nice.
Mats Norrman
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|