In my previous posting, I questioned the point of having public television
if it did not offer "unique" programming.

John Wiser wrote in response to me:

>>To duplicate what already exists?  Perform a supplemental service?
>
>Where _what_ exists?
>Supplemental to _what_?

I'm not aware of any type of programming on PBS which is not available on
various cable and satellite tv networks.  At a minimum, there's the Arts &
Entertainment Network, The History Channel, The Discovery Channel, The
Education Network, Home & Garden Network, Court TV, 24 hour news networks,
2 Congressional channels, and The Animal Planet Network.  So, I notice
duplication.

This leads to the issue of a public source providing a service to
the American people which is covered by private sources.  Whatever the
appropriate decision might be, the current duplication should be considered
in the equation.

Don Satz
[log in to unmask]