Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 8 Nov 1999 22:03:00 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> What is it that you are doing?
>
right now it's about the debate strat vs arbitrary in sweden - i'd be interested
in good site reports with clear examples of how it should/not be done, articles
explaining how to do it, how to document it, how to do cad drawings of profiles
created from composite layer drawings, etc. -
> Have you made a clear distinction between people who are actually
> employing a priori explicit stratigraphic excavation recorvery techniques,
> vs. the host of 18th, 19th and early 20th century folks who mucked it out,
> and then, post facto, took a look at the stratigraphy displayed in some
> trench or pit sidewall, and then, post facto, tried to put artifacts back
> into the appropriate strata for interpretation?
>
meant to be more of the former and less of the latter, although a few good juicy
"don't ever do this" examples would not be unwelcome
> The failure to make this necessary distinction has led several people to
> make some very erroneous statements about the development of method.
>
not naming any names?
geoff carver
http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|