HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
SouthArc <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:25:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Jim Chase wrote:

>There is no single thing, tool, or technique  which is more important than any
>other-be it artifact, stratigraphy ceramics, context, or whatever. The entire
>place, including it's location, is an artifact. An artifact being something
>which is the product of human behavior. Modern archaeology, including the
>Historic variety, is concerned with people and their behavior. We want to know
>who, what, where,  when, how, and why the people occupying a place did what
they
>did. Archaeology is not about artifacts, or stratigraphy, or ceramics.
These are
>all tools we use to answer the basic questions about human behavior posed
above.
>If the artifact, stratigraphy, ceramics are (or is) the primary interest
then we
>are no better, or farther along, than the Antiquarians of the last century.

Amen, Jim Chase.

                Lucy Wayne

ATOM RSS1 RSS2